AS AMEAÇAS À CORPORIDADE ESTATAL EM ROMEU E JULIETA

Authors

  • Alexander Martins Vianna Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ

Keywords:

State, Duel, Textual Materiality, Rhetoric

Abstract

From Norbert Elias’ approach, this essay intends to show how the Q2 textual materiality of Romeo and Juliet expresses, as moral thesis, that the traditional public order security would rise if Capulet’s, Montecchio’s and Prince Scalus’ household patriarchal authorities were simultaneously strengthened. Moreover, another chain of things would be necessary as well: the springing of the ethos of courtesy (on the individual level), the ideal of discretion, and the general recognition of  public justice as a central valor and condition of social peace.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Alexander Martins Vianna, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ

Doutor em História Social pela Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ.

References

BAINTON, Martin. 'Good Tricks of Youth': Renaissance Comedy, New Comedy and the Prodigal Son Paradigm. Renaissance Forum, 2001(2). vol. 5.

BREIGHT, Curt. Treason doth never prosper: The Tempest and the Discourse of Treason. Shakespeare Quartely, p.1-28, vol. 41, 1990.

CASTRO, E.B. Viveiros de; ARAÚJO, Ricardo Benzaquen de. Romeu e Julieta e a Origem do Estado. In: BORNHEIN, Gerd (Org.). Arte e Sociedade: ensaios de Sociologia da Arte. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar, 1978.

CREEDE, Thomas; BURBY, Curthbert. The most excellent and lamentable tragedie, of Romeo and Iuliet. London: Creede-Burby, 1599.

CROCKETT, Bryan. The Play of Paradox: Stage and Sermon in Renaissance England. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press, 1995.

DIDEROT, Denis. Hobbesianismo ou Filosofia Política de Hobbes. In: DIDEROT, Denis; D´ALEMBERT, Jean Le Rond. Verbetes Políticos da Enciclopédia. São Paulo: Unesp, 2006.

DOLAN, Frances E.. The Subordinate(‘s) Plot: Petty Treason and the Forms of Domestic Rebellion. Shakespeare Quartely, vol. 43, 1992.

EAGLETON, Terry. A Idéia de Cultura. São Paulo: Unesp, 2005.

ELIAS, Norbert. O Processo Civilizador. Rio de Janeiro: J. Zahar, 1994. vol. 2.

HATTAWAY, Michael. Blood is their argument: men of war and soldiers in Shakespeare and others. In: FLETCHER, Anthony; ROBERTS, Peter. (Orgs..). Religion, Culture and Society in Early Modern Britain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994.

HOBBES, Thomas. Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997.

HOLBACH, Barão de. Representantes. In: DIDEROT, Denis; D´ALEMBERT, Jean Le Rond. Verbetes Políticos da Enciclopédia. São Paulo: Unesp, 2006.

HOLMER, Joan Ozark. Draw, if you be men: Saviolo’s significance for Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare Quartely, p. 163-189, 1994(2), vol. 45

KOSELLECK, Reinhart. Crítica e Crise. Rio de Janeiro: UERJ/Contraponto, 1999.

LAKE, Peter; QUESTIER, Michael. Agency, Appropriation and Rhetoric under the Gallows: Puritans, Romanist and the State in Early Modern England, 1996(153).

MOULTON, Ian Frederick. ‘A Monster Great Deformed’: The Unruly Masculinity of Richard III. Shakespeare Quartely, vol. 47, 1996(3).

NEILL, Michael. Broken English and Broken Irish: Nation, Language, and the Optic of Power in Shakespeare’s Histories. Shakespeare Quartely, p. 1-32, 1994(1), vol. 45.

RIPA (OF PERUGIA), Caesar. Iconologia or Morall Emblems. London: P. Tempest & Benjamin Motte, 1709.

SAVIOLO, Vicentio. His Practise in two Books. London: John Wolf, 1594-95.

VIANNA, Alexander Martins. Estado e Individuação no Antigo Regime: Por uma leitura não-romântica de Shakespeare. 2008. Tese (Doutorado em História). Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro – UFRJ/IFCS, Rio de Janeiro, 2008.

Published

2009-06-30

How to Cite

Martins Vianna, A. . (2009). AS AMEAÇAS À CORPORIDADE ESTATAL EM ROMEU E JULIETA. Fênix - Revista De História E Estudos Culturais, 6(2), 1–23. Retrieved from https://revistafenix.pro.br/revistafenix/article/view/145